Ransomware attackers specifically target and attempt to destroy backup systems to increase the probability of payment. Hardening your system is critical. Please ensure you have reviewed your platform security using the Security Hardening Checklist
Cohesity

COHESITY Documentation

Explore our documentation to get started, discover products & new features, access troubleshooting guides, register sources, platforms support.

Products
Data Security Alliance
Visit Cohesity.com
Demos
Support
Blogs
Developers
Partner Portals
Cohesity Community
© 2026 Cohesity, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Use|
Privacy Policy|
Legal|
  1. Home
  2. Veritas NetBackup™ Administrator's Guide, Volume I
  3. Section IX. Administering NetBackup
  4. Using the NetBackup Remote Administration Console
  5. About improving NetBackup performance
  6. Determining better performance when the console is run locally or uses remote display back
Veritas NetBackup™ Administrator's Guide, Volume I

Determining better performance when the console is run locally or uses remote display back

Performance depends on the following:

  • The speed of the network

  • The console and the application server computer resources

  • The workloads on the console

  • The application server hosts

  • The amount of NetBackup data (Data is the number of jobs in the Activity Monitor or number of NetBackup policies.)

The console may perform better if it is started on the console's application server host first, and then it is displayed back to the desktop host. However, little is known of a situation where that configuration produces better console performance. As previously mentioned, the configuration is not recommended due to problems unrelated to performance issues.

Consider the following scenarios to determine what would provide the best performance for your configuration.

NetBackup performance scenario 1

Assume no deficiency in either the console host's resources or the application server host's resources. Assume that the amount of NetBackup configuration data being transferred to the console host far exceeds the X-Windows pixel display data. That is, the actual console screen being sent from the remote host.

Unfortunately, the only way to determine the viability of this situation is to try it. Network capabilities and the proximity of the two hosts influences each NetBackup configuration.

NetBackup performance scenario 2

Assume that the available resources of the application server host far exceed that of the console host.

Assume that the console host has a very limited CPU and memory as compared to the NetBackup master server being administered. (The console host is the computer on which the console is started.) If the console is run on the master server and displayed back to the desktop host, performance may be enhanced.

If the desktop host is a Windows computer, X-terminal emulation or remote display tools such as Exceed and VNC are required.

These scenarios address the performance aspect of using the NetBackup console. There may be other reasons that require you to display back remotely to your desktop, however, it is not recommended. Review the release notes for additional issues of relevance to the NetBackup Administration Console and the Backup, Archive, and Restore client console.

Table: Files containing configuration entries shows the files that contain configuration entries.

Table: Files containing configuration entries

File

Description

/usr/openv/java/auth.conf

Authorization options.

/usr/openv/netbackup/bp.conf

Configuration options (server and client).

/usr/openv/java/nbj.conf

Configuration options for the NetBackup Administration Console

/usr/openv/volmgr/vm.conf

Configuration options for media and device management.

$HOME/bp.conf

Configuration options for user (on client).

Feedback

Was this page helpful?
Previous

Enhancing console performance

Next

About adjusting time zones in the NetBackup Administration console

Feedback

Was this page helpful?